top of page

BirdWeb Website Redesign (Mobile)

Cover image.png
Introduction

What is BirdWeb? 🐥

Seattle Audubon Society's BirdWeb website enables users to learn about birds, locate birding locations and ecoregion, learn about bird species of particular conservation concern, find birding resources, and connect with Seattle Audubon's main website and other environmental conservation initiatives.

Team

Me (UX Designer & Front-end Engineer)

Mina Ryu

Lo Ciaflone

Lily Yang

My Role

UX Research, UX Design, UX Testing, Interaction Design

Time

Jun 2022 - Aug 2022

Problems 🧐

Users of BirdWeb expressed dissatisfaction with the website's outdated design and its lack of responsiveness on mobile devices. Additionally, our clients have raised concerns about the infrequent usage of the website, and and noted that the website did not align with Seattle Audubon's brand identity.

old website.png

* Actual screenshot of the current website when viewed on mobile.

Outcomes & Results ✨

60%

Improved accessibility to bird and bird-watching sites’ information

80%

Reduction in information load

Our Solution 🥁

Overview of our Process 👓

Overview
wired-outline-19-magnifier-zoom-search_e
Research
  • Previous Survey Data (N=212)

  • Comparative Analysis

  • Heuristic Evaluation

  • Accessibility Audit

  • User Persona

wired-outline-186-puzzle_edited_edited.p
Ideate
  • Define scope of work

  • Paper sketches

  • Feature prioritization

wired-outline-35-edit (1)_edited.png
Design
  • Mid-fidelity Prototype

  • Document design decisions

  • Design System and Components

wired-outline-245-edit-document_edited.p
Test & Redesign
  • User testing (N=5)

  • Affinity Diagramming

  • Research Report

  • Technical Feasibility

  • Prototype Hi-Fidelity

Firstly, Research 🔬

Research

Problems

old website.png

01 Outdated design

02 Less frequently used

03 Not responsive on mobile phones

04 Inconsistent with Seattle Audobon Society brand

* Actual screenshot of the current website when viewed on mobile.

Persona

persona.png

Ideation 💡

Scope of Redesign

01 Home Page

02 Browse Ecoregions (Bird watching sites) Page

03 Ecoregion Info Page

04 Bird Info Page

Paper Sketches

The team spent a week brainstorming different ideas for pages and made final sketches by combining our most favorite ideas.

01
Home Page
PNG image 2 1.png
02
Ecoregions Page
Birdweb coregions paper prototype-3 1.png
03
Ecoregion Info Page
Birdweb ecoregion pages-4 1.png
04
Bird Info Page
Sketch4.png

Design Iteration #1 ✏️

Design

Mid-Fidelity Prototype

01
Birds list on ecoregion info page 
Issues
long list of birds.png

Long unordered lists of birds

Non-sticky column headers

Information Overload

Users need to remember codes

Solution
Screenshot 2023-05-12 at 6.07.47 PM.png

Filter option

Bird pictures for better identification

02
Audio player and clear CTA's
Issues
Screenshot 2023-05-13 at 12.47.36 PM.png

Button description only on hover state (not visible on mobile)

No user control while playing sound

Solution
Screenshot 2023-05-13 at 12.50.28 PM.png

Added clear CTA's

Sound player to STOP/PAUSE bird sound

03
Compare birds and Recently viewed birds feature
Issues

User needs to go back and forth to compare different birds of similar species.

User has to search or navigate to the previous page if they want to go back to previously viewed birds.

Solution

Compare feature for different birds of same family

Recently viewed birds to easily navigate between viewed birds

Design System 🎨

style guide 1 1.png
style guide 2 1.png

Test 📋

Test

Participants

02 Experienced Birdwatchers
03 Novice Birdwatchers

Tasks

01
Find bird information
02
Find Ecoregion information
03
Navigate to other conservation projects and main website
Volunteer screen.png

Results

What worked well
Group 291.png
Group 292.png
Group 293.png

Key usability issues

01 Low scanability of content

02 Small text size

03 Use of jargon

04 Confusing buttons

05 Lack of interactivity in maps

Design Iteration #2 ✏️

Refine

After finalizing the features, we collaborated with the site developer to understand the technical feasibility of our proposed solutions.

Based on the feedback from users and the technical dev team, we created our final high-fidelity prototypes.

01
Small text size
Issue
issue 1.png

Difficult to read small text

Solution

Single column design to accommodate larger text and images

Subheadings - 16pt

Descriptions - 14pt

02
Information Overload
Issue
Puget Through - Sites 2.png
New users:

Overwhelmed by information

Experienced users:

Low scanability of information

No shortcuts

Solution
info over.png

Changed to clean and minimal layout with "read More" button

Separated information by categories

03
Jargon
Issue
issue 1.png
New users:

Birding terms such as ecoregions

All users:

Unknown project CTA's such as Sound to Sage

Note about CTA was not read by most users.

Solution
Bird info page.png

Changed birding specific language to more beginner friendly

Changed names of CTA's to more descriptive names (Sound to Sage -> Nesting data)

04
Maps don't look interactivity
Issue
Ecoregions and birding sites.png

Maps didn't look clickable even when they were

Users wanted to interact with the map

Solution
maps.png

Added location feature to help users locate themselves on the map

Added visual and descriptive cues to help users interact

Final Design 🥁

Reflection ✍🏼

Learnings & Takeaways

This was the first time I worked in a team and for a client. I learned that working in a team can help you come up with better solutions, get critique on your designs, and see the biases you get into the design.

Working with a client was a great learning experience because we had to work on creating a balance between the business needs and the user needs by involving multiple stakeholders. We also had to understand the technical feasibility of our design for which we had to work closely with the site developer. 

Next Steps

The immediate next steps would be to conduct a round of usability testing to ensure our redesign did not introduce any new issues and that the changes are effective.

 

bottom of page